Education Discrimination

Taste-taste flavor muakku already reached the peak.
After reading the rubric of Humanities at harianKompas edition today, I became increasingly jengkelsaja with the policy of the education system in Indonesia, who have increasingly ugly old only. Lately rubric Humanities Compass did a lot of highlights on the condition of education in Indonesia. Beginning with the news about good ideas from one head of RW in one village in the Sala Three of the creative to create an alternative school for junior high school students with the concept of opening schools up to the madness may be more accurately called the government's ignorance about the design of a new education path system .
In this new system of education that the government will divide the line into two channels of education, namely formal and formal standards independent. Distribution of this pathway is based on differences in students' academic ability and financial. Formal self-cater for students who are academically and financially established. While the formal standard is for students who are financially less can be said not even afford.
In other words the formal path is the path for students independently wealthy while the standard formal path is the path for poor students. Ridiculous indeed. I could not figure out until he could boxed-boxing education based fianansial level of the learner. In this case, the government argues that the formal independence will provide scholarships for students who are less capable poor to study engineering at this point. The question now is how many scholarships provided sich?.
The government itself states that at least there will be five percent of poor students who attend school in every school which conducts formal independent. I think this is also one of the other forms of ignorance. Try and imagine if there was a poor student who obtained a scholarship to attend formal postscript independent school where students are rich. Are not these conditions actually make this poor students into inferior and low self-esteem. When his friends always wore a starched uniform is clean and neatly by using the softening and perfuming clothing while the poor student is only able to wear a uniform, aka former hibahan from neighbors, would not these conditions actually make this poor student becomes the object of a spectacle for rich students ?
Is the distribution of this educational path is one of the missions of government in an effort to achieve the life of the nation?
I think education is the only way for our nation to keep pace with other nations. I just salute the government of Cambodia and Thailand are slowly taking shape itself by focusing on educating its citizens. Both these countries began to pioneer free education for its citizens. The Cambodian government itself began to divert nineteen percent of the total budget which is usually used as a military budgets to support educational development.
So like where the vision and mission of education in Indonesia? Want to be taken to where the education in our country? Does education have become merchandise that will produce outputan form of a certificate and diploma instead of analytical expertise and resources? And if education and rights only belong to rich people only?
Is it the poor people are prohibited from school?